AmeriCAN-DO Attitude

Are you an AmeriCAN or an AmeriCAN'T?

More Christian Teachings of Barack Obama’s Pastor

Gateway Pundit has a great post up exposing the hypocrite Barack Obama, who campaigned for the Senate in 2004, praising his Pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright: Obama: “I Don’t Need Mr. Keyes Lecturing Me on Christianity. That’s Why I Have a Pastor.” (Video)

Here are a few more Christian teachings by Obama’s pastor Jeremiah Wright:

** The government lied about Pearl Harbor. They knew the Japanese were going to attack.

** We’ve got a paranoid group of patriots in power.

** The government lied about the Tuskegee experiment and purposely infected African-American men with syphilis.

** Fighting for peace is like raping for virginity.

** We are doing the same thing that Al-Qaeda did with a different flag.

** Black men turning on black men- That is fighting the wrong enemy.

** We cannot see that what we are doing is the same thing that Al-Qaeda is doing under a different flag. If they can’t find the weapons of mass destruction then they are going to do just like the LAPD and plant them some weapons of mass destruction.

** The stuff we have done overseas has now been brought back home to our own front yard.

** The government lied about the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color.

Apparently, these are the lectures of Christianity that Barack Obama prefers.

Be sure to read Gateway Pundit’s post and watch the video he provides.

March 15, 2008 , 11:38PM Posted by | AIDS, Barack Obama, Racism, Reverend Dr Jeremiah Wright, Trinity United Church of Christ | Comments Off on More Christian Teachings of Barack Obama’s Pastor

Why It is Important to Emphasize Barack HUSSEIN Obama

Great comment left by prisoner105 at LIBERTAS:

Phoenix — emphasizing Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name IS important and SHOULD be done for a variety of reasons.

First, the PC police tell us not to. That’s as good a reason as any. As a free man I can do and say as I please. No thought police for me.

Second, it tells us who and what he is. He himself made much of it, in his announcement (that his middle name was Hussein and therefore it will make Muslims/foreigners love us). If he himself made much of it we are entitled to do so also.

Next, it is clear (read his autobiography Dreams From My Father: a Story of Race and Inheritance) that he makes much of his father’s Kenyan and Muslim heritage, and was deeply disappointed to find his paternal grandfather was not a Mau-Mau who killed white colonialists but a servant of the same. That his father, a bigamous and polygamist Muslim, died a drunkard who wrapped his Mercedes around a tree in a drunk-driving accident (not his first, either). That Barack Hussein Obama’s Black Nationalism, like Jeremy Wright, looks favorably on Islam as the “enemy of White People.”

The most charitable interpretation of Barack Hussein Obama is that he is engaged in an endless rebellion and rejection of his white mother, who married a succession of failed, charismatic third world men, and dumped off with his grandparents in Hawaii while she went off to be “authentic” in writing her Phd thesis on Peasant Indonesian Blacksmithing in the boonies of Java. In this interpretation his middle name and his flaunting it early in the campaign signifies once again his symbolic rejection of his mother and all white people in his reaction to being dumped. [This is the one I personally subscribe to.]

The less charitable interpretation of Barack Hussein Obama is that he made his way as a race-hustler and race baiting charlatan ala Sharpton, and is now unprepared for the reality of being something other than what he’s been all his life: a con man riding on his race and nothing else. In this interpretation his flaunting of his middle name early in his campaign is indicative of his desire to be “Black Enough” to Blacks suspicious of his Harvard, Hawaii, and foreign origins. Which early on seemed to be an issue. [There might be elements of that.]

For the record, I DO think Barack Hussein Obama is overly sympathetic to Muslims because he views them both as “enemies” of White people and America (which he clearly dislikes to hates, as a proxy for his mother) and as an ethnocentric example of being “Black” the way my family (myself included) is suddenly very Catholic on St. Patrick’s day. That sort of thing I know from personal experience is very easy to fall into unless you constantly examine your own concience and mind.

March 15, 2008 , 10:36PM Posted by | Barack Obama, Black Liberation Theology, Racism, Reverend Dr Jeremiah Wright, Trinity United Church of Christ | Comments Off on Why It is Important to Emphasize Barack HUSSEIN Obama

Barack Obama Lied About His Pastor

Gateway Pundit has the details here: BUSTED… Obama Knew About Wright Was Wrong Last Year

Barack Obama is a liar. Period. And he should NOT be allowed to use his flowery speeches to get away with his nonsense.

Also, as you read the post, note that Barack Obama listened to tapes of Reverend Wright’s Black Liberation Theology sermons while at Harvard. Barack Obama knew DAMN WELL that Reverend Wright is a racist America-hater.

The fact that Barack Obama did not leave this Church LONG AGO tells me one thing: Barack Obama is a racist America-hater. Period.

March 15, 2008 , 9:29PM Posted by | Barack Obama, Black Liberation Theology, Racism, Reverend Dr Jeremiah Wright, Trinity United Church of Christ | Comments Off on Barack Obama Lied About His Pastor

Barack Obama Agrees with “The United States of White America” Racism

I’m going to continue to repeat this obvious point of this entire situation: any normal, non-racist, non America-hating person would get up and leave their Church if they heard their preacher spouting this kind of nonsense: Obama “Nodded In Agreement” At A Wright Anti-American Sermon

Wright laced into America’s establishment, blaming the “white arrogance” of America’s Caucasian majority for the woes of the world, especially the oppression suffered by blacks. To underscore the point he refers to the country as the “United States of White America.” Many in the congregation, including Obama, nodded in apparent agreement as these statements were made.

As Ace notes, even if Obamorons want to claim that Obama was not nodding in agreement, this, at the very least, proves that Obama is a bald-faced LIAR in saying he never heard his racist, America-hating “mentor” spew this crap when he was attending Church.

It is time for Obamania to fall on its race-baiting ass.

Oh, and while we’re at it, hopefully the racist leftist Oprah will go down in flames with Obama and Wright, considering she is also a member of this racist Church. It’s about damn time she was exposed as the racist Leftist scum that she is.

Also see: 

Obama Never Heard Wright’s “Controversial” Statements? Funny, He Writes About Them In His Memoir

And Even More On That: This time from Mark Steyn.

I’m not a believer in guilt by association, or the campaign vaudeville of rival politicians insisting this or that candidate disassociate himself from remarks by some fellow he had a 30-second grip’n’greet with a decade ago. But Jeremiah Wright is not exactly peripheral to Barack Obama’s life. He married the Obamas and baptized their children. Those of us who made the mistake of buying the senator’s last book, The Audacity of Hope, and assumed the title was an ingeniously parodic distillation of the great sonorous banality of an entire genre of blandly uplifting political writing discovered circa page 127 that in fact the phrase comes from one of the Reverend Wright’s sermons. Jeremiah Wright has been Barack Obama’s pastor for 20 years — in other words, pretty much the senator’s entire adult life. Did Obama consider God Damn America as a title for his book but it didn’t focus-group so well?Ah, well, no, the senator told ABC News. The Reverend Wright is like “an old uncle who says things I don’t always agree with.” So did he agree with goofy old Uncle Jeremiah on September 16th 2001? That Sunday morning, Uncle told his congregation that the United States brought the death and destruction of 9/11 on itself. “We nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye,” said the Reverend Wright. “We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards.”

Is that one of those “things I don’t always agree with”? Well, Senator Obama isn’t saying, responding merely that he wasn’t in church that morning.

There are many preachers who would be happy to tell their congregations “God damn America.” But Barack Obama is not supposed to be the candidate of the America-damners: He’s not the Reverend Al Sharpton or the Reverend Jesse Jackson or the rest of the racial-grievance mongers. Obama is meant to be the man who transcends the divisions of race, the candidate who doesn’t damn America but “heals” it — if you believe, as many Democrats do, that America needs healing.

I’d like to check the record as to Obama’s whereabouts on Sept. 16th, 2001. If he wasn’t in church that day — where the hell was he?

And is he really trying to tell us no one, no one informed him Wright had laid the blame for the deaths of 3000 Americans, quite predictably, at the feet of American evil?

March 15, 2008 , 3:25PM Posted by | Barack Obama, Black Liberation Theology, Racism, Reverend Dr Jeremiah Wright, Trinity United Church of Christ | Comments Off on Barack Obama Agrees with “The United States of White America” Racism

Newsflash: Guys Treat Promiscuous Women Like Tramps

Yeah, big surprise, I know. But, amazingly enough, there are some people out there to whom this is actually a new revelation.

But, that is the result of “do me” feminism, which has been taught to females and males in American society for decades now.

Via Steven M. Wawshawsky in The American Thinker: The Spitzer sex scandal and ’do me’ feminism

The major news media are covering the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal in increasing detail. But a few items from the original court complaint are worth highlighting:

First, the complaint (at para. 25) recounts an e-mail conversation between one of the madams of the Emperors Club VIP and a potential prostitute who decided not to go to work for the agency. In the e-mail, the young woman remarks how a friend of hers recently had completed her first job for the agency at a rate of $500 per hour. After noting that this was the kind of money the young woman “make[s] very easily in photoshoots” (porn?), the young woman said that she was a “little bit shock[ed] and confuse[d]” by the fact that her friend had sex with the client twice in one hour – without the client “taking her out to dinner before.”

Now, I seriously doubt that this young woman’s friend was in need of a good meal. So what the young woman really is saying is that she was “shocked” and “confused” that her friend – a prostitute, remember – was not offered even the most basic rudiments of “romance” before doing the deed with her client. This is truly sad. This debauched and degraded young woman, who was considering joining a prostitution service – and have sex with complete strangers “to make extra money” – nevertheless believed that there should be at least some romance in the transaction. In other words, despite treating herself as a nameless, faceless commodity, she wanted her johns to treat her as a “lady” deserving of tenderness and respect.

Newsflash: Most men do not treat prostitutes, and promiscuous women in general, as ladies deserving of tenderness and respect. They treat them like tramps. Something inside this young woman understands this. Yet I strongly suspect that she subscribes to the tenets of modern “do me feminism” (see here), which holds that sexual promiscuity in women is a form of equality, empowerment, and self-actualization. This is the sexual ideology that is relentlessly inculcated in young people in schools and colleges, and “glamorously” portrayed on TV and in the movies. It is best illustrated, perhaps, by the TV show Sex and the City, not to mention the tabloid exploits of so many of today’s young starlets. See Carol Platt Liebau’s critique of “do me feminism” here.

Another passage in the Emperors Club VIP complaint (para. 32) paints a rather less glamorous picture of the life of a “high-class” call girl, however. This passage recounts a conversation among the operators of the agency about a prostitute who had missed an appointment and who had sent them a “crazy” e-mail message. The operators of the agency “discussed the possibility that the prostitute was on drugs,” and decided they “could not do business with the prostitute the way she was acting.” One of the operators then remarked: “A lot of these girls deteriorate to this point.” In other words, many of the prostitutes, even those who are paid thousands of dollars per hour, end up blitzing their minds on drugs.

Why would that be, if, as so many liberal commentators have argued, these are “victimless” transactions among “consenting adults”? Perhaps because there is something deeply, innately offensive to female self-identity to be a tramp. That’s why for most of human history, prostitution has been seen as an act of desperation, humiliating to the woman and man alike (albeit with fewer physical and psychological ramifications for the man). It is an act that debases a woman’s character and integrity, however much she is paid. And as Governor Spitzer surely is learning, it destroys the love, trust, and stability of family life.

It is not a respectable way for pretty girls to make some extra cash.

I’ll close with a timely bit of news:

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is reporting that, based .. gathered in 2003 and 2004, approximately 50 percent of U.S. girls aged 14-19 have had sexual intercourse. Of these, 40 percent have a sexually transmitted disease. The rate is 48 percent for black girls. Overall, it is estimated that approximately 26 percent of all U.S. girls aged 14-19 are infected with an STD. 26 percent! While liberals decry the lack of “safe sex” education and free condom distribution, these results are to be expected in any society that encourages immature and irresponsible children to engage in promiscuous sex. Which is precisely what we have been doing in this country for several decades.

Go ahead and call me a prude or a scold, but all I can say is that I am thoroughly disgusted.

March 15, 2008 , 12:38PM Posted by | Liberalism, Life, Relationships | Comments Off on Newsflash: Guys Treat Promiscuous Women Like Tramps