AmeriCAN-DO Attitude

Are you an AmeriCAN or an AmeriCAN'T?

Barack “the ASSMAN” Obama, Reporting for Booty

Heh. Too good not to steal from Ace at Ace of Spades HQ, who posted HERE and HERE on the great picture of Obama peeking at some (underage) tail at the G8 Summit.

Here’s a fantastic montage put to music by Nick Jacob:

Obama Sneaks A Peek at Some Booty

Of course, Obama’s propagandists in the mass media rushed to his defense, twisting themselves into pretzels to explain why Obama could never, ever make such a mistake… EVAH! Ace rips that BS apart here: Stupid: ABC News Spins on Obama’s Check-Out

ABC News is pretty sure he’s only watching his own footing, despite the fact that he has stopped moving and is safely positioned on the stair when he looks down in the direction of the 16-year-old’s booty. Oh, maybe he’s looking at her footing. Or someone’s footing. Or anything, except that which it appears he’s looking at.

Not only that, ABC News is pretty sure this is purest gallantry on Obama’s part; he’s just trying to make sure that Pretty Young Thing successfully navigated the stairs.

How dare you for suspecting otherwise.

Ace also makes a good point here about the blatant corruption in which the mass media partakes whenever one of their heros is in the White House:

I seem to remember the media spinning in the same who-are-ya-gonna-believe-Obama-or-your-own-lyin’-eyes when he clearly bowed to the Saudi king, too.

In the nineties, liberals and the media (BIRM) engaged in semantic parsing to try to explain that Clinton wasn’t really lying when his words were clearly dishonest. (Depends on what the meaning of “is” is; I was never alone with Monica Lewinsky, not once, except when I was playing hide the cigar with her, but I never “felt” like we were alone; depends on how you define “sexual relations.”) In these cases the media offered “context” and “fresh ways of looking at the evidence” all of which, of course, were intended to discredit the obvious truth at hand.

And now, in the late 00’s, the media is engaging in photographic or visual parsing with Obama. A look is not really a look; a bow is not really a bow. It may appear that way to you, but that is just because you are unsophisticated and lack the expert look- and bow- analytical abilities of your superiors, the MSM, and furthermore, you lack a crucial understanding that the MSM has and you don’t: Obama never errs and never appears the fool, ever, never ever ever.

This latter fact — as hard-wired into the structure of the universe itself as the speed of light — trumps all other supposed “facts.”

And finally, the great commenters at Ace of Spades HQ do their usual great job of breaking things down so simply that even a caveman could understand it (but apparently still not the mass media).

People who defend this prick aren’t watching the sequence of events in the video:

1. Jailbait from Brazil walks up steps.
2. Obama does a rubberneck, locks his focus directly onto her ass like a sniper and freezes. The woman who he will soon help down the steps is behind Obama, out of his sight.
3. tick tock tick tock…
4. The woman who was behind Obama steps forward into his line of sight.
5. She reaches for his hand, he grabs it, helps her down.
6. Sarkozy grins and thinks “I like this anti-American radical!”

You can spin whatever you want about steps 4-6 but 1-3 proves that the guy is a filthy goat.

On another topic, the drunk tank is a man light because Ace is back!

Posted by: Crusty at July 10, 2009 03:35 PM

**********

Sarah Palin never said she could see Russia from her house. Did the media ever clarify that it was that slunt Tina Fey who said it and not Palin? No. They ran with the story that Palin said it to make her look like an idiot. And now these same scumbag assholes take that picture of Barry and are telling us what we are really looking at.

Posted by: TheQuietMan at July 10, 2009 03:36 PM

Yep. Let’s also not forget the whole “fake turkey” lie and meme the Left and mass media spread about President Bush and his Thanksgiving in Iraq. Did the media go through and explain that the BDSers were nutjobs and that President Bush wasn’t a tool like our current President? Nope.

Also, in the spirit of Seinfeld, Barack Obama shall now be known as the ASSMAN:

In the future, Mr. pResident, you might want to watch more Seinfeld so you know the rules about peeking at cleavage/ass.  Heh

So what if he isn’t gawking (and I think he is). Mock him mercilessly. What comedian wouldn’t do so? Oh, right. Sorry.

Posted by: ed at July 10, 2009 03:47 PM

Heh. Exactly. It really does not matter a whit whether Obama was actually checking her out (but I think most normal guys realize that he was doing so). The point is that this picture is prime mocking material. Only Obama’s sycophantic, knobgobblers (which would include the entire mass media and at least 69+ million American voters) would think otherwise.

How long do you think the media is gonna keep pissing on us and tell us it’s raining?

They spin for Obama on everything — economy, foreign policy, spending, taxes, and now this?

Posted by: Tweets at July 10, 2009 03:50 PM

Simple answer: they will keep doing it until the American public wakes.the.f***.up and stops being willingly useful, ignorant idiots and rejects the spin.

I don’t really know yet whether he was ogling or if it was just coincidence. But here, the MSM pretty much squelched the story until they thought they could debunk it, even though what was happening is still up for debate.

However, with Palin seeing Russia from her house, even though that CLEARLY was not what she said, the MSM let the story gather momentum and become a part of the public record. To my knowledge, there has not been an MSM correction of the misperception to date.

Well, they are the deciders. If someone misstates what Palin says and it makes Palin look uninformed, well, they look the other way. No story there. But Pailn’s wardrobe, they’re all over that one.

Miserable, two faced hypocrites.

Posted by: RM at July 10, 2009 03:57 PM

More good points:

“Look, two points: This is a trivial issue. He may or may not have scoped out a 16 year old beauty.”

True. It is trivial. Where it ceases to be trivial though is in the media reaction. They are not reporting here. They are telling that “no Obama didn’t do this.” They are attempting to cover and make excuses for him. And as you said this is a trivial matter, so why waste time doing that? And if they are bending over backwards to cover for him on a trivial matter, then what else are they covering for him on?

“We lose credibility if we harp on this where the evidence is not crystal clear. It’s OK to make fun, but the compare this to the bow to the Saudi king is over the top.”

The comparison is valid. Not in the act itself, but in the attempt at media coverup for something they shouldn’t be doing. You’re looking at the point from a different angle than you should be.

Posted by: buzzion at July 10, 2009 03:59 PM

Yep. Also, stop with the “we lose credibility if…” whiney BS. Did the Left, Democrats and mass media lose credibility the past 8 years with their BS they pulled about anything and everything with regards to President Bush, any Republican, any Christian, any conservative, any conservative pundit, Joe the Plumber, Carrie Prejean and now Sarah Palin? Nope. They kept smearing and distorting and smearing and distoring over and over and over AND OVER again until their smears and lies and memes — even on the most trivial things — became accepted conventional wisdom. Well, two can play at that game, so get ready to deal with getting a dose of your own medicine, Lefties.

Exactly, which is why the left is pissed off at us for laughing. This takes away from The One’s “divinity”. It means he’s human. If The One is human, it means he’s susceptible to error. OMG! NO! That cannot be! Hence, all the silly assed spin over what is nothing more than a chuckle that Barry’s checking out some 16 year old’s ass. Hey lefties, you guffaw with your ‘sophicated humor’ when a has-been comic insinuates the rape of a 14 year old, but get up tight about this?

Posted by: GarandFan at July 10, 2009 04:27 PM

Exactly.

Who gives a sh*t which way or what he was looking at?? Remember Alinsky’s rules? You guys want to play nice? What the hell have they done, and continue to do, to Sarah Palin?

Sheesh.

And I don’t, for one minute, doubt that this narcissist, given the chance, wouldn’t hit whatever the hell he had the chance to hit. Marriage, kids, whatever, be damned.

/rant off.

Posted by: Jane D’oh! at July 10, 2009 06:33 PM

Exactly. Ridicule, ridicule, ridicule and then ridicule some more. And when the Left gets all pissy and whiney. RIDICULE SOME MORE. You ridicule the living hell out of them until they stop the sh*t they started with their BDS, their Sarah Palin smears, their Joe the Plumber smears, their Carrie Prejean smears.

Remember the scene in The Alamo when the Mexican army shot a dud cannonball at The Alamo? William Travis picked it up, put it in their own cannon and told his men to send it right back at those f***ers (he may have used different wording than that). That is exactly what we need to do. No more pussyfooting around. The Left has been doing this for YEARS with NO repurcussions. Time to send their sh*t right back in their despicable faces. They wanted a war? Well it’s high time we GIVE them one.

Advertisements

July 11, 2009 , 1:12PM - Posted by | Barack Obama, Media Bias, President George W Bush, Sarah Palin

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: