AmeriCAN-DO Attitude

Are you an AmeriCAN or an AmeriCAN'T?

Manchurian Obama?

I can’t say that it has not crossed my mind. Personally, I don’t believe Obama is stupid at all. I believe he truly believes in the ideologies of the people with whom he has surrounded himself his entire life: Black Liberation Theology, Socialism, Communism, Marxism. That said, I don’t believe he is any sort of genius who has had every bit of his master plan work out for him. I do believe he sought out powerful, influential people who shared his beliefs in Black Liberation Theology, Socialism, Communism and Marxism in order to help him destroy this country. He knew he was the perfect vessel through which he could completely deceive the masses.

But I still wonder just how much Obama is really in control and just how much everything he does is simply orchestrated by his radical handlers and he simply serves as the vessel to deceive and sell and implement the radical policies.

“It’s some creepy stuff to be sure. Rush intimated the other day that it’s possible that there is someone/thing “running” Obama, but that he wasn’t sure. Generally, these kind of statements are the garden variety kookiness that simmers beneath the surface on both the right and left. But, consider the leaked statement to Isreal (“We are going to change the world, please don’t interfere”) along with BO’s other statist goals and I don’t know what to think, really. Here’s to hoping that it is just kookiness and not fact…..”Posted by: volfan at August 04, 2009 03:25 PM

The scary part, if you think about it and put this in context with his entire political career, is that Obama being “run” by someone/thing is not too far-fetched.

(1) Gained cred from TUCC, Rev Wright and ACORN in Chicago
(2) Political career jumpstarted by terrorist William Ayers
(3) Job at Chicago Annenberg Challenge given to him by terrorist William Ayers
(4) Cushy house in Chicago helped financed by slumlord Tony Rezko
(5) Won election to State Legislature by dirty tactics
(6) Once in State Legislature, lead Democrat Emil Jones put his name on all existing legislation which was sponsored by other Democrats in order to “make [him] President”
(7) With the exception of his championing of infanticide in IL, he voted “present” pretty much every time to keep his radicalism hidden
(7) Jack Ryan’s divorce papers opened to force him out of the race to get Obama to run unopposed
( Given a prime spot in the 2004 DNC Convention to introduce him to the world with a speech full of empty platitudes
(9) George Soros backing/funding once he got into the Senate to plan for his Presidential run
(10) Mass media not only not being critical of him, but also praising him, willingly being his propaganda outlet AND deliberately smearing and attacking all his opponents, from Sarah Palin to Joe the Plumber

That’s just off the top of my head and doesn’t even include the tens of things he’s already done in 6 months as president…

The truly scary thing, in my opinion, is that I cannot figure out if Obama is the true radical, who has mastered hiding his true self and selling himself as some moderate ‘messiah’ to the masses, as an expert Saul Alinkski student would… or if he is just a willing pupper of many different anti-American, anti-capitalist, pro-Communist, anti-Israel groups within the United States.

Posted by: Michael in MI at August 04, 2009 03:57 PM

More good points:

“What was that quote from Dark Knight (haven’t seen it) about some just wanting to watch it burn?

Seems he’s just pushing to incite some kind of revolt, or total collapse due to an Atlas Shrugged moment.

Does he think he can just remain above it all or is he just that sick?”

Posted by: Scott J. at August 04, 2009 04:03 PM

He’s that filled with a thirst to exact revenge on whites, the successful, and the West. He indicated that inflicting pain is his goal when he said, during the campaign, that he would still raise capital gains taxes, even if it resulted in reduced receipts to the government. The Precedent said that it was an issue of “fairness” (i.e. revenge). The Precedent doesn’t care about helping anyone. He is motivated by hurting those he thinks deserve the pain … and that’s us, and the West, in general.

We’ve all been given fair warning about this. The rest of the Washington junta are just useful idiots whose socialist desires help The Precedent carry out his intended destruction.

Posted by: progressoverpeace at August 04, 2009 04:11 PM


“He’s a true 100% radical. Born and bred. He needs people pushing and steering only because he’s a wimpy guy, not a real leader. But he approves of the direction and the plan. He cannot even conceive of any other direction to take.”

Posted by: Marilena at August 04, 2009 04:05 PM

Oh, and this is the quote from The Dark Knight, which is very apt:

Alfred Pennyworth: Because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

Also, here is another quote by The Joker from that movie which describes Obama well:

The Joker: Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. I’m an agent of chaos. Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It’s fair!

This is EXACTLY what Obama is all about, and has been all about his entire political career: anarchy. Anarchy through ACORN, through Saul Alinsky “community organizing”, anarchy through stirring up racism, stirring up class warfare, stirring up hatred for Wall Street, stirring up hatred for “the rich”, stirring up hatred for Big Oil, Big Business, Big Insurance, Doctors, people who drive SUVs, etc etc etc. Anarchy and chaos is EXACTLY what Obama and his Saul Alinsky-trained Marxist minions want.

They want the chaos, because they want “crisis”. Because, as he and his handlers have stated, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”

Good question:

OK, so what’s the tipping point? The Carter Moment when the country looks and sighs a collective WTF and the tide begins to turn? What event(s) would cause people to consider that they elected a radical that would just as soon see America burn rather than shine? So long as the MSM treats him like his halo can’t be dimmed, then it’ll be an uphill battle – but what could happen for even them to pull an about face? Anyone?

Posted by: volfan at August 04, 2009 04:20 PM

August 4, 2009 , 3:44PM Posted by | Barack Obama, Black Liberation Theology, Communism, Fascism, Leftist Groups, Liberalism, Marxism, Racism, Reverend Dr Jeremiah Wright, Saul Alinsky, Socialism, Trinity United Church of Christ, William Ayers | Comments Off on Manchurian Obama?

Why So Socialist?

I so want to see these posters be turned into bumper stickers and start popping up on car bumpers all across America like the poster is popping up all over Los Angeles, CA. heh


And these comments express my thoughts perfectly:

It’s not ugly, it’s reality. The joker would love to be able to do as much damage as Zero is attempting. Ugly is what has happened to this country. It’s become a nation of bastard 10 second attention span, lazy, crybaby p#ssies that don’t want to succeed, they f###ing want someone to take over their parent’s job and take care of them. I have no regard for what they think about anything. They disgust me.

Posted by: maddogg at August 03, 2009 08:51 PM


I think the reason that the lefties have their panties in a knot over this poster is threefold:

1) It nicely mocks the socialist workers paradise propaganda picture of the one that all the Obama losers have/had stuck on their cars or in their windows.

2) It reinforces the unstated but now increasingly accepted notion that Obama is a joker – a clueless affirmative action candidate that has no management, executive or really life experience and is completely out of his depth as the president of this country.

3) Just like the drive by attacks from Jon Stewart and similar sewer trout on Sarah Palin – this image sticks and stays with people in a very visceral way.

You know this thing hit the mark because of all the squealing from the lefties. I would love to get this on a sticker with identical dimensions to that nauseating “Dear Leader” one from the election. Driving around with that on my car would raise a few eyebrows around my sleepy suburban enclave here in NC.

Posted by: RDA at August 03, 2009 08:52 PM

August 3, 2009 , 10:03PM Posted by | Barack Obama, Black Liberation Theology, Communism, Liberalism, Marxism, Saul Alinsky, Socialism | Comments Off on Why So Socialist?

We are in a Political Fight to the Death with People Who Will Stop at Nothing

Hey ace and all the rest of you right-wing squishes out there… PAY.ATTENTION:

Saul Alinski wrote a book called Rules for Radicals. Hillary Clinton wrote about it in her senior’s thesis. And if Hillary Clinton learned from it, Barack Obama taught from it: the term community organizer was coined by Alinski and was the centerpiece of his theory that the socialization of America could best be accomplished from within the system since Americans were alert to revolutions forced upon them from the outside.

One of the Rules for Radicals is Make the enemy live up to his/her own book of rules. Think about the genius of that. Just let that sink in. When a Republican has an ethics scandal, it’s “hypocrisy” and “double standards” and all the rest. But when a Clinton or a Pelosi or a Charley Rangel or a Chris Dodd or a Barney Frank or a William Jefferson has an ethics scandal, no one bats an eye. Why? Because of course they’re immoral! They’re Democrats.

Alinski could see that moral people have to be held to moral standards when immoral people do not. We’d better learn a lesson from this, right quick. Here’s an example of the kind of lesson good and decent people must learn about people like Saul Alinski and his followers:

The Battle of Guadalcanal was the first real test of the US Marine Corps in World War II. There was real anger toward the Japanese after Pearl Harbor and the atrocities they had committed in China and to American prisoners at Bataan, but the Marines had not yet dealt with them face to face and still reserved a professional soldier’s decency towards surrendering troops.

A Marine recon unit reported seeing Japanese troops flying a white flag on an isolated spit of land near Guadalcanal, and so A Marine named Frank Goettge asked for volunteers to help rescue these surrendering Japanese soldiers. 25 men stepped forward, and when they reached the beach the Marines warily went ashore to help the trapped Japanese. Once they were all within range, the Japanese opened fire with machine guns, and after hours of fighting only one Marine was able to escape. As he swam away he looked over his shoulder, and saw the flashing Samurai swords of the Japanese officers as they hacked at and beheaded the survivors. When reinforcements returned they found that their buddies had been mutilated and dismembered, and any Marine corps tattoos had been hacked off their arms and stuffed into their mouths.

The Marines never treated the Japense the same way after that.

Alinski and his followers want you to believe that if you fight dirty in response to people fighting dirty with you, then you have lost your morals and in fact your identity. But that’s a lie.

We are in a political fight to the death with people who will stop at nothing – and I’m not talking about your average decent Democrat, but rather these Alinski radicals. And if we don’t face the same realization as those Marines on Guadalcanal and give back as brutally as we have taken, then we will lose.

Which is what they want. And if we do lose to these kind of tactics, there will be no more decent people left in politics. As of today, we’re one short already.

August 1, 2009 , 11:43PM Posted by | Barack Obama, Bill Whittle, Communism, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Liberalism, Marxism, Military History, Political Correctness, Saul Alinsky, Socialism | 5 Comments

The Democrat Party: A Criminal Organization Masquerading as a Political Party

I have been saying this for MONTHS now. Conservatives just don’t get it (yes, I am looking at you, Ace and DrewM at Ace of Spades HQ and you, AllahPundit and Ed Morrissey at And I would add that not only is the Democrat Party and the Left the enemy, but so too is the mass media. Until conservatives understand that WE.ARE.AT.WAR in this country (politically), we stand no chance to get our country back from the radicals.

Yes, my friends, it’s once again time to quote Sean Connery’s famous speech from The Untouchables, written by David Mamet — the lecture the veteran Chicago cop gives a wet-behind-the-ears Eliot Ness (Kevin Costner, back when he was a movie star) while they sit in a church pew. “You want to get Capone? Here’s how you get him: he pulls a knife, you pull a gun, he sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That’s the Chicago way!” If you just think of us — liberal Democrats — as Capone you’ll begin to understand what we’re up to. And we just put one of yours in the morgue.

I don’t know why I’m telling you this, but maybe now you’re beginning to understand the high-stakes game we’re playing here. This ain’t John McCain’s logrolling senatorial club any more. This is a deadly serious attempt to realize the vision of the 1960s and to fundamentally transform the United States of America. This is the fusion of Communist dogma, high ideals, gangster tactics, and a stunning amount of self-loathing. For the first time in history, the patrician class is deliberately selling its own country down the river just to prove a point: that, yes, we can! This country stinks and we won’t be happy until we’ve forced you to admit it.

In other words, stop thinking of the Democratic Party as merely a political party, because it’s much more than that. We’re not just the party of slavery, segregation, secularism, and sedition. Not just the party of Aaron Burr, Boss Tweed, Richard J. Croker, Bull Connor, Chris Dodd, Richard Daley, Bill Ayers, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and Emperor Barack Hussein Obama II. Not just the party of Kendall “Agent 202” Myers, the State Department official recruited as a Cuban spy along with his wife during the Carter administration. Rather, think of the Democratic Party as what it really is: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party.

If you had any sense, you would start using our tactics against us. After all, you have a few lawyers on your side. Sue us. File frivolous ethics complaints against all our elected officials until, like Sarah, they go broke from defending themselves. (David Paterson would be a good place to start.) Challenge the constitutionality of BO2’s legion of fill-in-the-blank czars — none of whom have to be confirmed, or even pass a security check. (Come to think of it, neither did Barry.) Let slip your own journalistic dogs of war, assuming you have any, to find Barry’s birth certificate, his college transcripts, whether he applied to Occidental as a foreign student, and on which passport he traveled in 1981 to Pakistan with his friend Wahid Hamid, for starters.

You might also want to think about interviewing New York literary agent Jane Dystel, who a) contacted the totally unknown Obama in the wake of an adulatory New York Times piece in 1990 and b) got him a $125,000 advance for a memoir that c) he couldn’t write, even after a long sojourn in Bali, which d) got the contract canceled, whereupon e) Dystel got him $40,000 from another publisher, following which f) the book finally came out to glowing reviews and g) Obama fired her. Wouldn’t she have an interesting story to tell?

Of course, you won’t. You’re too nice, too enamored of history and tradition to realize that the rules have changed. Remember, I live and work in a town where, “Hello, he lied,” isn’t a joke; we men of the Left are perfectly comfortable lying, cheating, and stealing — hello, Senator Franken! — in order to attain and keep political power. Not for nothing is one of our mottos, “By Any Means Necessary.” You see, we’re the good guys, and for us the ends always justify the means. We are, literally, shameless, which is why Bill Clinton is now a multi-millionaire and Eliot Spitzer is already on the comeback trail.

In Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, “the fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.” This is the book that “Reset” Rodham (what ever happened to her?) and BHO II grew up reading and continue to live by. If you don’t understand that that’s the way we see you — as the enemy — then you’re too dumb to survive. Remember that for us politics is not just an avocation, or even just a job, but our life. We literally stay awake nights thinking up ways to screw you. And one of the ways we do that is by religiously observing Alinsky’s Rule No. 4.

Just adding a few comments I left at Ace of Spades HQ, as I was incredulous (to put it lightly) that Ace himself and many of his commentors actually did not understand this article:

“The important thing is the hate.”

Posted by: ace at July 07, 2009 02:04 PM

Bingo. That is the entire point. The Left, Democrats and mass media HATE us. Hate conservatives, hate Republicans, hate non-elites, hate Uncle Toms, hate Pro-lifers, etc etc etc. And they use that hate to utterly destroy us “by any means necessary”. The ends justify the means.

And yet, I would say most people on our side STILL do not get this. The fact that you are baffled by this article shows you don’t understand it, or refuse to admit it.

People refuse to admit that the Left intends to destroy this country and remake it in their own communist image and they will do it by any means necessary and tear down and destroy anyone who tries to get in their way, Sarah Palin was simply the first. If anyone else gets as popular with conservatives, they will Palin-ize them as well. And the next one and then next one and the next one, getting even more dirty and despicable each time.

UNTIL people wake up and realize this is our current atmosphere with which we have to deal.

That’s why many of us are pissed off about many of you who so easily discarded Sarah Palin (and refused to stand with Rush “I hope he fails” before that). Because it shows you STILL just don’t get what’s going on in this country.

Which shocks me, since I know you all have been paying attention to what has been going on the last 8 years. I just don’t understand anyone who does not realize that the Left is our enemy, the Democrat socialists and communists are our enemies and the mass media is our enemy.

Many out there call that wacko talk and conspiracy talk. Seriously? A mass media outlet cooking up fake documents to take down a sitting President? And the thousands of other mass coordinated attacks of anyone GOP or conservative and mass coordinated apologizing and covering up for anyone DEM or liberal? Come on, wake up.

We are at (political) war here.

Posted by: Michael in MI at July 07, 2009 02:17 PM


“I sense anger and perhaps frustration but no hate. I think he’s pointing out the hate on the Left and saying, “Hey, a-holes, the Democrats hate you, so smarten up.”

Posted by: Unicle tweets at July 07, 2009 02:14 PM


The fact that that is flying over the heads of ace and others here shows that they still don’t understand that. Very disheartening.

Posted by: Michael in MI at July 07, 2009 02:24 PM

#89 Michael in MI

Some of us do get that, which is why Val-U-Rite is more important than water.

Look: We still know more about Joe the Plumber than any of the plants Dr. Utopia has called on at his town halls — that’s sad and pathetic. Their fucking shills, hacks and acolytes shift in and out of the propaganda sets and no one, not one of the GOP dares expose them.

Ace ditched his data-mining project that would have done this, that we who still give a shit about this country could have done what needs done — and for what? Scary letter from an attorney, I suppose.

Read any lefty blog and you will come to understand that as long as there is one, single person in the United States that calls themselves a Republican, they will not rest: They intend, they wish, they plan (many of them) to exterminate–literally, not just figuratively–anyone who calls themselves Republican or conservative. And they, the cowards, the sidelong, shuffling bastards have and are wielding the lumbering machinery of government to do so. So long as any Republican lives, every failure, every evil, every crime will be nailed to his back; for it is his failure to complete their perfection that caused the ill.

If you don’t get that, if you think, “Oh, that’s just crazy talk from Looney Town, it’s just a mild difference of opinion; the people of the two parties are mostly the same.” you are so stupid I imagine you have to remind yourself to breath.

Posted by: jimmuy8 at July 07, 2009 02:41 PM


“That’s the thing. We don’t even need to play dirty. There’s no reason to lower ourselves to their level.

They file baseless ethics complaints. We should file real ones targeting actual ethics violations. We don’t.

They lie like mad about us. We could tell the truth about them. We don’t.

Recriminations about how we don’t fight dirty enough are missing the point. We don’t even fight -fair-.


Yep. And this relates to the Rep. King thread. What he said was considered mean. People come out of the woodwork to scream that he is mean. Squishy republicans tell him to shut up because he makes us look mean.

The squishes think we lose votes becuase we are PERCEIVED as mean but the truth is we are PAINTED to be mean. It doesn’t matter what we say, it will be twisted to be mean. So why the hell not tell the truth? Bush wouldn’t even prosecute criminal vandalism of the F**KING WHITE HOUSE because he wanted to be a uniter. How did that work out for him?

Posted by: kidney at July 07, 2009 02:58 PM


By the way, if people can’t figure out the article, I’ll point out what should be obvious. The article is in National Review (the conservative magazine). It’s obviously written by a conservative who is pretending to write from the perspective of an honest radical Democrapper. By portraying what Democrats really believe, the author illustrates to his fellow conservatives what they are up against. Namely, the other sides hates you. Despises you. Will dance on the grave of your newborn baby. That level of hatred. I can’t believe anyone couldn’t figure that out.

Posted by: Realist at July 07, 2009 03:06 PM

July 7, 2009 , 12:53PM Posted by | Barack Obama, Class Warfare, Conservatism, Democrats, Identity Politics, Leftist Groups, Liberalism, Marxism, Media Bias, Racism, Reverend Dr Jeremiah Wright, Saul Alinsky, Socialism, William Ayers | 1 Comment

When the Right Goes Left


I agree with the ‘morons’ over at Ace of Spades HQ probably 90% of the time, but here is a prime example of that 10% where I part ways: Going Alinsky on Letterman

Okay, “going Alinsky on Letterman” I can definitely support. It’s the way they are “going Alinsky” which I cannot support: boycotts and “Fire Letterman!” rallies.

I’m against boycotts, as I have stated previously with regards to The View, HERE and HERE. I’m one who advocates “if you don’t like something, DON’T WATCH IT”. Don’t like Limbaugh? Don’t listen to him. Don’t like Letterman, don’t watch him. Don’t like the vapid dopes on The View, don’t watch them. Don’t like Hannity (which I don’t), don’t watch him.

I left this comment on a Facebook discussion of this:

Seriously, the Left is MUCH more active at this crap. Do people like when the Leftist tools organize to complain to Facebook to have conservatives kicked off Facebook? The answer to that is not to start practicing that immature crap ourselves. Same thing applies here. I know there are a lot of Glenn Beck fans on my Friends list. Would they like the Left organizing something like this to kick him off the air, simply because they didn’t like what he said?

What happened to free market principles where a business or product succeeds or fails on its own merit? If Letterman gets an audience for his crap, more power to him. That says more about the sorry-ass state of the attitudes of Americans than it does about CBS and David Letterman.

Personally, I think American Idol — and basically any other “reality” TV show — is crap and want it off the air. But instead of being an ass and organizing against it, I simply don’t watch it and mock anyone who does. (heh) Very simple, see. 🙂

Seriously, I can’t stand this boycott crap. Boycott by changing the channel.

Ya know, someone (not the Ace of Spades HQ “someone”, but just someone in general) needs to explain to me how using mob-rule tactics to bully a business into firing someone we don’t like is any different than the tactics of the Lefty anti-Prop 8 mobs. They didn’t like how a business voted, so they advocated boycotts of their businesses. How is this any different? Don’t like a joke, so we grab our pitchforks and organize to destroy them? What happened to standing up for Americans to have the freedom to watch and listen to anything they so choose, even when it’s tasteless crap.

Also, how is this any different than what the Left did to Don Imus? He should NOT have been fired. His comments should have been exposed, he should have been condemned or defended on the merits of those comments and then left to have his career live or die based on people deciding he was worth listening to anymore. Same thing applies here.

Call out Letterman LOUDLY and OFTEN and expose him and the Left for their tasteless crap and their utter hypocrisy. But, then leave it up to the American people to determine Letterman’s future success or failure. If Letterman continues to get good ratings, then that just shows that our society now accepts tasteless sexism and hypocrisy towards Conservatives. That is depressing and despicable, but not grounds for wielding pitchforks to deny the American people the right to listen to or watch such things.

Geez, this is sad. The only one making any sense over there is the stupid liberal douche troll:

this is sad… and pathetic

I thought conservatives snubbed their noses at the liberal PC culture that infests America today…

and now, you’re advocating the tactics of those you hate?

when you don’t have principles, then you have nothing. you may get rid of letterman, but you lose the greater war (by bringing this country into a censored, PC frenzied environment).

let’s blackball anyone who says anything that offends anyone… fuck free speech and 1st amendment!

Posted by: palin steele at June 13, 2009 01:02 PM

Okay, the last part is stupid, since “free speech” does not come without consequences and the 1st Amendment does not protect anyone from boycotts. But the rest is spot-on. This crap is about using the tactics of the Left. In other words, “the end justifies the means”. That is the logic of the Left. Yet, now conservatives are advocating it. As the douche troll stated, “this is sad and pathetic”.

go ahead, go blackball a comedian for making a tasteless joke (btw, I dont give a fuck about letterman just to be clear… I’m more worried about the longterm implications for certain ideals conservatives hold)

but you don’t ever get the right to feign outrage in the future when all different groups get their panties tied up over being offended by the most harmless un-PC verbal attacks… in this fight against letterman (a mere pawn of the left), you have strengthened the actual arsenal (PC correctness) of the left

if you successfully get Letterman off, it WILL be used against you in the future.

Posted by: palin steele at June 13, 2009 01:11 PM

Exactly. If this were the Left going after a conservative media member or comedian for a joke or statement they didn’t like, my bet is there would be outrage over the bullying tactics.

And then there’s this false analogy offered by a conservative:

Seems like getting Dan Blather booted worked out ok.

Posted by: cumulonimbus at June 13, 2009 01:15 PM

So now we’re comparing rightly working to cause the firing of a media member who is supposed to be objective, but instead blatantly passes off lies as facts to the American people in the effort to undermine a Presidential Election… to working to cause the firing of a comedian telling a tasteless joke? Come on, guys. You’re much better than this.

“Free speech doesn’t mean free of consequences, you stupid f*ck.”

no it doesn’t.  but boycotting companies and such is the tactic of the PC-loving left… its always been denigrated by conservatives because it goes against their principles.  Now conservatives want to adopt the tactic because one of their own is being attacked… its hypocritical.  Stand on your principles and you will be stronger in the long-term, go for short-term gains and you will be weaker for it.

Posted by: palin steele at June 13, 2009 01:15 PM

I can’t believe the liberal troll is still making the most sense. Ugh.

And then there’s this:

That’s the point of this whole exercise. PC outrage is primarily used as a weapon against the right. Reid can say the war is lost with no consequences. Actors can kiss a maniacal dictator like Castro on the ass with no consequences. Movies can mock Christians with no consequences. But if a conservative violates the PC code, usually his career is over.

Posted by: Matt at June 13, 2009 01:22 PM

Right, and you know what the answer to that is? You do the exact same thing as them. Letterman tells a tasteless joke about the “Right” and gets away with it? Then you have one of your own go out there and loudly and proudly tell a tasteless joke about the “Left”.  (For example, to make a point, start making tasteless jokes about Letterman’s wife and their child, and see how he likes it when the shoe is on the other foot).  Then, when the “Left” cries about it, you point out that you were just taking their lead and if they don’t like tasteless crap like that, then they should shut their own f*cking mouths and live up to their own standards.

The answer to free speech we don’t like is not less free speech, but MORE free speech. Recall the Mohammad Cartoons. Our answer to Muslims taking offense to that was not to join with them in boycotting, but to tell to STFU and deal with it, that’s how free speech works. But now all of a sudden, the rules have changed for conservatives?

Sorry, but I just cannot support this and I am very disappointed in seeing this advocated by one of my favorite conservative blogs.

June 13, 2009 , 4:30PM Posted by | Censorship, Conservatism, Fascism, Hollywood, Liberalism, Saul Alinsky, Sexism | 1 Comment