DanNY at Gathering of Eagles-NY has an update on the attack on the OIF Veteran and his family, which includes the videos he promised.
[ … ] Most importantly, for those who have claimed the veteran’s wife took the first physical action. Your claims are proved to be unfounded. The video clearly shows the woman in green advancing from screen right and touching the veteran’s wife before the wife pushes her away.
It shows that every physical action was initiated by the ‘peace’ thugs. Every action that escalated the conflict was theirs. They were out of control and unrestrained in their actions. Every action taken by the veteran and his family was in self defense or in seeking to stop the violence. No one sober can view these videos in any other fashion.
The wheelchair man bumping his chair into the leg of the veteran.
The lady in white grabbing the veteran’s sign and throwing it into the street.
The lady in white then standing on the sign in an attempt to prevent the veteran from recovering it.
The veteran’s wife interjecting herself between the veteran and the lady in white to defuse the situation.
The lady in green charging over with her red sign and pushing the veteran’s wife with her right hand.
The veteran’s wife pushing the lady in green away from her.
The lady in green and the lady in white attacking the veteran’s wife.
The veteran grabbing the lady in green to restrain her from attacking his wife.
The man in yellow and man in blue shirts pushing the veteran to the ground while he is restraining the lady in green. (Partially obscured by signs).
The lady in white kicking the veteran’s wife in the head.
The veteran’s son rushing over to pull the lady in white away from his mother.
The lady in white kicks the veteran twive while he is restrained.
The lady in green attacking the veteran’s son.
The lady in white attacking the veteran’s son.
This video should be required viewing by anyone wanting to know what happens when ‘peace’ thugs are given free rein to vent their ‘peaceful’ feelings.
Dan Maloney, NY State Coordinator, Gathering of Eagles
Also, DanNY passes along the new discovery that these “peace” thugs will now have free legal representation. Wonderful.
“By the way, we were put on notice on Sat. while we were standing out in Meadville that word is that the recruiters and people standing in support of the troops in the area are ”fair game because the attackers will be given free representation for any altercations that may occur…” , more than likely Sandy Kelson (VFP) will be representing them. We have always known to watch our back, but this is the 1st time we were told that the “peace thugs” would have free representation. Nice, huh?!!!”
I have been reading LT SMASH’s reports (thanks to him providing updates via MilBlogs) from his experience infiltrating the “anti-war” protest on March 17th, 2007 in Washington, D.C. and have been looking forward to his latest report telling of how the “March to the Pentagon” went. It is definitely a must-read. It had me laughing on numerous occassions. The title of his post alone had me smiling and laughing right off the bat: Part IV: A Tsunami of Stupid
Check out all four of his reports here (thanks to Gathering of Eagles website for posting links to them all):
Posted: 23 Mar 2007 08:23 AM CDT
LT Smash infiltrated the March on the Pentagon. This is one of the funniest accounts I’ve read yet of the schizophrenic peace movement. No doubt this inside scoop will wound tender Moonbat Pride.
She is only 25 and completely partisan and an ideologue, so I guess that is her excuse. However, I have tried on multiple occasions to recommend to her that she start reading Military Blogs in order to get a better idea of what the people in the military community think. She obviously has refused. Or is just ignoring what they say and is being a typically arrogant liberal Democrat in saying that she knows better than the military, a la “General Pelosi”.
As Scott Malensek, of the military blog Flopping Aces, noted in his post “Who is in Charge in Washington, D.C.?”, the Democrats for years have refused to read Intelligence reports from our nation’s Intelligence community, have refused to read the progress reports from the military Generals in Afghanistan and Iraq and have refused to even meet with the Generals to get updates, choosing instead to rely on the “mainstream” media reports and get their marching orders about military strategy from left-wing groups like CODE PINK and Moveon.org. From her latest two posts, it seems this “crazy liberal” gets her information from the same pathetically ignorant, left-wing agenda-driven sources. Brilliant.
I noticed two things from skimming the comments sections of her blogs. (1) A couple military supporters (and even one liberal) tried valiantly to talk some sense into her, but failed and (2) most of her liberal friends agreed with her ignorant assessment of things.
Thus is the ignorant left-wing echo chamber here on MySpace. Instead of actually getting their information from the source, Military Blogs, they prefer to read left-wing “mainstream” media rags and left-wing agenda-driven sources such as ThinkProgress.org.
This is a prime example of why I gave up on discussing issues of the day with so-called liberals, leftists, so-called “progressives” and Democrat-voters. They all typically can be summed up here: How Modern Liberals Think.
The following are just a few posts from the military blog community concerning how they feel about the Democrats’ latest bill, which “crazy liberal” feels shows that President George W. Bush hates the troops, since he is against it. I guess these current and veteran military members also hate their fellow soldiers?
Good LT at The Jawa Report – Democrats Vote to Lose Iraq
After spending billions in taxpayer dollars to “pork the vote,” the democrats have voted for surrender by six votes.
Like we said all along, the Democrats are the party of defeat, surrender, and weakness. Our enemies laugh at us because of them.
Bush has his veto pen ready.
Curt at Flopping Aces – Coalition of the Bribed
Greyhawk at MilBlogs – Business as Usual
In short, the $20-billion plus in add-ons are totally legal, and the way we’ve always done business in the past. So there.
No argument here.
Update: I should add that Hoyer is scrambling to counter USA Today’s condemnation of the bill. They joined the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal who exposed the ugly particulars earlier in the week. The LA Times (and other Tribune group papers) joined the club today. “Members and the public have had a week to examine it” – indeed. Since many are rightfully upset about the “business as usual” aspect of the bill, defending the “new direction” as being “business as usual” might not be the best track.
Greyhawk at Milblogs – What If?
While many pundits would have us believe otherwise, the pork-laden bill to stop the surge and withdraw troops from Iraq is not the supplemental Iraq and Afghanistan funding bill that will ultimately (and hopefully soon) have to be debated in congress – it’s a political ploy, and a dangerous one to be conducted in time of war.
So what if congress refuses to pass or even debate such a bill in a timely manner? Here’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ answer.
Soldier’s Mom at MilBlogs – Gimme What You Got…
The Wall Street Journal carried an Editorial this past weekend called “‘Peanuts’ for Patraeus“ which covered the shameful pork spending that the Congress has added to the Supplemental Defence Appropriations Bill. I haven’t seen a lot of MSM covering the deplorable trough diving being done — $20 million to restore farmland damaged by freezing temperatures, $1.48 billion for livestock farmers, $74 million “to ensure proper storage for peanuts,” $25 million for spinach…
So I pulled out the provisions of the Bill on military and veterans health care and grabbed the trusty calculator and here’s some notes:
With all the news stories about the “scandal” at Walter Reed, here’s what I find in the appropriations for Health Programs (speak up if I missed anything): Defense Health Programs: $2.79 billion of which $2.29 billion shall be for operation and maintenance [only available until 9/30/2008 so spend it while ya got it!] and of which $500 million shall be for research, development, test and evaluation [available until 9/30/2009]. [note that the $2.79 billion for military health isn’t even 2x the Democrats’ $1.48 Billion for livestock farmers!]
And for VETERANS AFFAIRS:
Compensation & Pensions: $20 million for a pilot program for disability examinations [OK, remember, the Dems have included $25 million for spinach…]
Medical Services: $414.982 million, which includes $30 million for a new Level I comprehensive Polytrauma Center (doesn’t say where this will be); $56 million for prosthetics; $100 million for contract mental health care when appointment waiting times exceed 30 days [whiskey tango foxtrot??? there should be NO STRINGS for mental health care… it should be left to the VA how to spend this — like using some of this $100 million to HIRE AND TRAIN TEAMS IN THE TREATMENT OF COMBAT-RELATED PTSD NOW ‘CAUSE THE FLOOD GATES ARE ABOUT TO OPEN ON THE VA!!!!]; and $228.982 million shall be for the treatment of veterans of the global war on terror.
Medical Administration: $256.3 million, including $6.3 million for polytrauma support clinic teams for case management
Medical Facilities: $595.0 million, including $45 million for upgrades to polytrauma centers and $550 million for non-recurring maintenance as identified in the VA Facility Condition Assessment
Medical & Prosthetic Research: $35 million
Administrative Expenses: $62 million, including $1.25 million for digitization of records [yeah, that should digitize about 100 pages of records] and $60.75 million “for expenses related to hiring and training new claims processing personnel” [YES!!! wonderful! but not nearly enough!] [again… compare to the $74 million “to ensure proper storage for peanuts”!]< EM>
OK, that makes the VA total $1.38 billion — and the Dems have included $1.48 BILLION just for livestock farmers. More money for cows & horses than Veterans??? Yeah… you have not only shown us your priorities, you have shown us your stripes.
More (with a rant) at Some Soldier’s Mom
Blackfive – Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory
I sure hope that this legislation does not embolden the enemy, make General Petraeus’s job and our operations more difficult, etc.
…With Democrats holding 233 seats and Republicans with 201, Democrats were able to afford only 15 “no” votes. Accordingly, Pelosi, and her leadership team spent days trying to convince members that the bill was Congress’ best chance of forcing Bush to change course – an argument that was aided when they added more than $20 billion in domestic spending in an effort to lure votes.
They got a breakthrough Thursday when four of the bill’s most consistent critics said they would not stand in its way. California Democrats Lynn Woolsey, Diane Watson, Barbara Lee and Maxine Waters said they would help round up support for the bill despite their intention to personally vote against it because it would not end the war immediately…
It’s too bad that a majority of Congress doesn’t have the metal that our military does.
If you get a OIF or OEF troop reaction to this, email me. I’d like to know what they think of this support from our politicians.
Uncle Jimbo at Blackfive – Friday Freefly 04- Bribes for antiwar votes & Iraq news
Today’s Freefly starts with the, sadly, all too common vote buying to gain enough support for the Democrats plan to cut and walk one year from now. The Politico
That additional money was attractive for at least one lawmaker, Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), an Out of Iraq Caucus member. His spokeswoman, Danielle Langone, cited $400 million for a one-year reauthorization of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act.
“That’s pretty vital for our district, so we’ll be voting for the bill,” Langone said.
UPDATE: Looks like they are reeling the wacked out left back into the boat and may pass this sad legislation. I do hope it passes the Senate so W can put the veto boot to it.
Curt at Flopping Aces – The Amnesia of the Left
How soon all is forgotten:
“Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), a former Black Panther who now represents one of the most liberal districts in the nation, decided yesterday to support the Iraq war supplemental spending bill because he was promised help with an issue “unrelated” to the bill.”
Why wasn’t it just a few months ago something like this was written?
A Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may not condition the inclusion of language to provide funding for a congressional earmark, a limited tax benefit, or a limited tariff benefit in any bill or joint resolution (or an accompanying report) or in any conference report on a bill or joint resolution (including an accompanying joint explanatory statement of managers) on any vote cast by another Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner.
Yup, that swamp is draining real fast.
Curt at Flopping Aces – An Act of Political Theater
House Democrats called for a new direction in Iraq on Friday, passing a measure ordering President Bush to withdraw U.S. combat troops from Iraq by September 2008.
Bush vowed to veto the measure if it makes it to his desk.
“A narrow majority in the House of Representatives abdicated its responsibility by passing a war spending bill that has no chance of becoming law and brings us no closer to getting our troops the resources they need to do their job,” Bush said from the White House Diplomatic Reception Room while joined by family members of veterans and troops in combat.
Bush called on Congress to fund the troops, saying the current bill contains “too much pork, too many conditions.”
“The purpose of the emergency war spending bill I requested was to provide our troops with vital funding. Instead, Democrats in the House, in an act of political theater, voted to substitute their judgment for that of our military commanders on the ground in Iraq.”
High-ranked senators also vowed Friday to strip the language from the bill that requires troop withdrawal.
Democrats won passage by a 218-212 vote on the $124 billion war spending bill, which will fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Bush took a sledgehammer to their skulls this afternoon where he flat out told them, them being the defeatocrats, that they will not prevail.
[Go to Flopping Aces to see the YouTube video]
Of course this matters not, Pelosi and company knew this would not succeed but they have to appease their gods…aka MoveOn.org…and at least make it appear as if they are doing what they are told to do.
The WaPo did a good job of describing this new strategy:
The Democrats claim to have a mandate from voters to reverse the Bush administration’s policy in Iraq. Yet the leadership is ready to piece together the votes necessary to force a fateful turn in the war by using tactics usually dedicated to highway bills or the Army Corps of Engineers budget. The legislation pays more heed to a handful of peanut farmers than to the 24 million Iraqis who are living through a maelstrom initiated by the United States, the outcome of which could shape the future of the Middle East for decades.
They had to add 20 billion dollars worth of pork to get this passed by the slimmest of majorities and they really believe they have a mandate. What planet do these nimrods inhabit I wonder?
I mean come on, anyone with any common sense understands this bill was just a offering to the Democrats masters, hoping they will be satiated for a bit. But one politician took Mr. Cut and Run himself to task. Mr John Murtha, the man every Marine is ashamed to have to admit was a Marine, was taken to the mat by Sam Johnson today and it’s a must see:
[Go to Flopping Aces to see the YouTube video]
But it did little to change the outcome. Enough bribes were passed around to assure 2 Republicans would side with Pelosi (Wayne Gilchrest and Walter Jones) along with 216 Democrats.
The Senate will remove the timeline, and most likely much of the pork, so it will get signed into law. Lieberman will not side with the Democrats on this one and they know it. So in the end what was accomplished?
Dan Riehl thinks he knows:
Putting aside the dubious Constitutionality of the bill that may or may not be tested, it will need to survive the Senate and a possible veto first, is it really a victory when individuals who never voted to fund the war now vote for to fund it, knowing their rationale for doing so is going to be immediately stripped away?
I’m telling ya, nothing but theater. Go ahead you nimrods, celebrate the passing of this bill, burn a few soldier effigy’s and have a big friggin party with a 12 foot bong…..
Your attacks against this country and our soldiers does not go unnoticed.
Club For Growth calls out a few freshman politicians who ran on a platform of fiscal responsibility:
The Club for Growth denounced the 218 Democrats and 2 Republicans in the House of Representative who voted for the Iraq supplemental spending bill, containing $24 billion worth of wasteful pork-barrel projects. The Club specifically singled out freshmen Democratic Representatives Nancy Boyda (KS-2); Heath Schuler (NC-11); Nick Lampson (TX-22); Tim Mahoney (FL-22); and Harry Mitchell (AZ-5) who won their House seats on a campaign to restore fiscal responsibility to Congress and cut out earmarks. Instead these politicians caved to political pressure, throwing American taxpayers under the bus on their way down.
Ace of Spades HQ with a much needed history lesson:
Anyone remember the media firestorm over Tom DeLay’s promises of porks, and threats about payback, in regards to the passage of the prescription medicine bill?
So if I have this right: It’s wrong for a Republican Majority Leader to cut side-deals and make threats regarding the passage of a purely domestic social welfare bill — so wrong the media was all but calling for a federal investigation — but it’s okay for a Democratic Speaker of the House to do precisely the same to secure a bill about war?
Do I have that right?
Yup, you have that right….
- The Strata-Sphere
- Hang Right Politics
- Airborne Combat Engineer
- Atlas Shrugs
- A Blog For All
- The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- Right Wing Champ
- Jammie Wearing Fool
- Sweetness & Light
- Dumb Looks Still Free
- The Jawa Report
- Don Surber
- Gateway Pundit
- Michelle Malkin
- Say Anything
- Hot Air
- Little Green Footballs
The following is a list of Conservative, Military and Anti-Idiotarian blogs which have reports, pictures and video of the Gathering of Eagles that took place in Washington, D.C. on Saturday, March 17, 2007.
Blog Reports with LOTS of Pictures:
GatheringofEagles.org – Mission Accomplished
GatheringofEagles.org – Mainstream Media Misreporting on GOE
GatheringofEagles.org – Gallery is Up!
GatheringofEagles.org – The Age of the Eagle
Military.com – The Gathering of Eagles, photos and videos.
Michelle Malkin – Blogburst: Gathering of Eagles — 30,000 strong
Michelle Malkin – What They Didn’t Show You on TV
HotAir.com – Flickr Photo Album
Flopping Aces – The March of the Moonbats
Flopping Aces – The Gathering of Eagles Report
Flopping Aces – March 17th was a Great Day for the Real Peace Activists: Those Who are Pro-Victory!
Flopping Aces – 1,2,3,4 What In The World Are They Protesting For?
A Soldier’s Perspective – The Chemtrails Are Coming, The Chemtrails Are Coming
A Soldier’s Perspective – Reflections on the Gathering of Eagles (Pt. I)
Reflections on the Gathering of Eagles (Pt. II)
The City Troll – The Day in Pictures
Sweetness & Light – Photos From Today’s Rent-A-Mob For Terrorism Rally
Sweetness & Light – Ramsey Clark’s Remarks In Support Of Terrorism
Sweetness & Light – Tiny Anti-War Wall Street Protest Gets Full Coverage
Atlas Shrugs – The Gathering of Eagles
Old War Dogs – Eagles Up!
Old War Dogs – The Day We Took Our Country Back
Old War Dogs – The Day We Took Our Country Back Part II
Gateway Pundit – Antiwar Socialist Hacks Outclassed By Gathering of Eagles
The Chatterbox Chronicles – The Gathering of Eagles!!
HotAir – Gathering of Eagles
HotAir – Gathering of Eagles photo essay; Update: Fox News interviews Kristinn Taylor about GoE
The Redhunter – A Gathering of Patriots
An Ol’ Broad’s Ramblings – Media Bias?
Wake Up America – Peace Activists Arrested: Eagles All Day Updates
Mike’s America – The Eagles Have Landed
Mike’s America – Early Bird Eagles are on the Scene
Mike’s America – Eagles Rule the Roost
Mike’s America – Eagles Returning to the Nest: Mission Accomplished!!!
Mike’s America – A VICTORY for Eagles Today
Mike’s America – Winning the Propaganda War at Home: Lessons From the Gathering of Eagles
This Ain’t Hell – Gathering of Eagles
Gates of Vienna – Gathering with the Eagles
AR15.com – After Action: Gathering of Eagles Counter-Protest in Washington DC – PHOTOS
Conservative Propaganda – Vets vs Moonbats, Part 4
Gathering of Eagles, Miracle in Washington
Free Republic – Gathering of Eagles Report
SCSU Scholars – Update from Washington, D.C.
Lifelike Pundits – At the Gathering of Eagles
Right on the Right – Gathering of Eagles Picture Update ..1
Michael Fumento – Protest Rally Photos
Robert C. Sampson – I Was at Gathering of Eagles I
Semper Gratus – Moonbat Monkey Stomp on the Mall
Ms Underestimated – Protestors Spit on FOX News Microphone
Mark Levin Fan – Levinites were at the Gathering of Eagles Rally!
Jack Langer – Power to the People
HotAir.com – The Gathering of Eagles
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 2
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 3
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 5
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 5
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 6
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 7
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 8
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 9
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 10
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 11
LifelikePundits.com at Gathering of Eagles 12
Gathering Of Eagles March 17, 2007, Washington DC
Mary Katherine Ham – A Gathering of Eagles
Gathering of Eagles & War Protesters – 17 March 2007
Gathering of Eagles
Gathering of Eagles National Anthem
Protester vs. Vietnam Vets 3-17-07
Free Hugs for Vets
WWII veteran at Gathering of Eagles rally March 17, 2007
Age of Hooper – Gathering of Eagles – So Brave
Gathering of Eagles 1
Gathering of Eagles 2
Gathering of Eagles 3
Gathering of Eagles 4
Reporter tries to sucker Soldier in hit piece interview GOE
Inside the ANSWER rally part I
[Clicking on the photo above will take you to the Military Blog post of Bill Faith of Small Town Veteran and Old War Dogs about the Gathering of Eagles, a gathering of patriotic Americans on March 17th, 2007 to protect the Vietnam War Memorial from the anti-American Leftists who plan to protest that day.]
I plan to update this post throughout the day today with much, much more information and links to the many, many Military Blogs who are promoting this event. For now, here is the basic information, via GatheringofEagles.org:
Leftist activists who march to the Pentagon next month will discover that their path won’t be as clear as it has been in the past.
The group, led by Cindy Sheehan, Jane Fonda, Ramsey Clark and their ilk, plan to gather March 17 at the Vietnam Memorial Wall to begin a march to protest America’s involvement in the Iraq war. The date marks the fourth anniversary of the war’s beginning.
This time, however, protestors will see objectors if they spit on Iraqi veterans again, or throw paint on a war memorial. This time, they will encounter a buzz saw of Vietnam veterans and supporters who will gather to protect the Wall, and show their support for U.S. troops. The counter-protestors are calling themselves the Gathering of Eagles.
“… An eagle knows when a storm is approaching long before it breaks. The eagle will fly to some high spot and wait for the winds to come. When the storm hits, it sets its wings so that the wind will pick it up and lift it above the storm. While the storm rages below, the eagle is soaring above it.”
An unknown author wrote that description, but it describes how the veterans see their mission. They are angry that the Wall is being used as a jumping off point for a political protest and they are gathering to protect it from another storm of anti-war activists.
“The anti-war/anti-America group cannot be allowed to use the Vietnam Memorial Wall as a back-drop to their anti-America venom and stain the hallowed ground that virtually cries out with blood at the thought of this proposed desecration … it must not happen,” said veteran Bud Gross. “… All Americans are invited to support our effort, which is intended as a defender of hallowed ground and intended as a non-violent competition between those that would sell out America and those of us who support freedom and keeping the fight with the enemy on distant shores.”
The group defending the Wall will be wearing armbands to identify themselves. Those who are unable to stand with the defenders are being asked to wear armbands with small U.S. flags to show their own communities that they abhor the Fonda-Sheehan tactics.
“We’ll be there to act as a countervailing force against the Cindy Sheehan-Jane Fonda march from the Vietnam Memorial to the Pentagon,” retired Navy Capt. Larry Bailey said. “We will protect the Vietnam Memorial. If they try to deface it, there will be some violence, I guarantee you.”
Bailey and thousands of his fellow Vietnam vets are worried that the anti-war protesters will damage the wall, just as they spray-painted the steps of the Capitol at their last march.
The wall is sacred to the men and women who fought in that war.
“It is our contact with our dead brothers — those who lost their lives in the cause of their country,” Bailey said.
And so it is that Washington will see a Gathering of Eagles – Americans determined to stand up against leftist propagandists who denigrate U.S. troops and the mission for which they sometimes sacrifice their lives.
Retired Col. Harry Riley organized the Gathering of Eagles. Organizers hope thousands will show up in Washington from as far away as Hawaii, and they won’t only be Vietnam veterans. Families, friends and veterans of other wars, including Iraq, and soldiers still on active duty, will be there to defend the Wall.
“When we say a gathering of eagles, that signifies people who support the American way,” Bailey said.
The leftist Web site MarchonPentagon.org describes the anti-war demonstrators this way: “The March on the Pentagon has already attracted more than 1,500 endorsers, including prominent individuals and national and grassroots organizations. Students on college campuses and in high schools will be attending in large numbers. There will be a large turnout from the Muslim and Arab American community, which is organizing throughout the country.”
The movement is well-financed. Its sponsor list is lengthy and contains highly recognizable names, as well as those of Fonda and Sheehan:
· Former U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark (who offered his services to defend Saddam Hussein)
· Ultra-liberal Congresswoman Maxine Waters
· Former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney
· Ron Kovic, Vietnam veteran and author of “Born on the 4th of July”
· Mahdi Bray, executive director, Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
· Waleed Bader, vice chair of the National Council of Arab Americans and former president of Arab Muslim American Federation
· Medea Benjamin, co-founder, CODEPINK and Global Exchange
· Free Palestine Alliance
· Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
· Islamic Political Party of America
· FMLN (Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front)
· Islamic-National Congress
· Gay Liberation Network
· Muslim Student Association
· Jibril Hough, chairman, Islamic Political Party of America
Retired Air Force Col. Smitty Harris, a former Vietnam POW, doesn’t believe Fonda’s protests carry the weight they once did. Harris says Fonda’s actions at the march last month were “anti-American,” just as they were in the 1970s, and won’t have much effect on public opinion.
“It was big news during the Vietnam era when they had these marches … because people didn’t have all the alternative ways of finding out what is true and what’s not,” he recently told Agape Press. “So I don’t think it’s going to have a big effect.” In fact, he says, it could even be counterproductive.
Today, Harris points out, Americans have talk radio and media outlets like the Fox News Channel to hear the voices of those who do not agree with Jane Fonda’s point of view.
For an exchange of information, visit and join the Gathering of Eagles message board.